Ceja

Ceja v. Mobile Products, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20253:24-cv-07767California5,706 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BEATRICE CEJA, et al., Case No. 24-cv-07767-LJC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. REMAND

MOBILE PRODUCTS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendant.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand. ECF No. 21. Plaintiffs filed suit against the City and County of San Francisco and the State of California in San Francisco Superior Court in April 2021. They subsequently named Mobile Products, Incorporated as an additional defendant. Mobile Products, Incorporated removed the case to federal court in November 2024. Plaintiffs seek to remand the action, claiming that the removal was improper and untimely. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the papers submitted by the parties and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand. Plaintiffs’ requests for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.