Ainsworth

Ainsworth v. Chanthalangsy

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20253:24-cv-02350California1,363 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TYRELL AINSWORTH, Case No.: 3:24cv-2350-AJB-VET

CDCR #AL-4915,

ORDER: (1) DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. AS BARRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); 14 and

CHANTHALANGSY, DR. (2) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION

MUHAMMAD, DR. SAHA, JOHN DOE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

#1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE #3, FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE RAFAEL ACEVEDO, REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 On December 11, 2024, Plaintiff Tyrell Ainsworth, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. The Court dismissed the action without prejudice on December 17, 2024, because Plaintiff failed to satisfy the filing fee requirement. ECF No. 2. The Court notified Plaintiff that to have his case reopened he must either pay the civil filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) no later than January 31, 2025.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.