Minacis

Minacis v. Park

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20254:24-cv-00042California1,210 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MIKELA MINACIS, Case No. 24-cv-00042-JST

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT; ORDER

v. RE-OPENING CASE; ORDER

SETTING DEADLINE TO FILE

JASON PARK, AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendant. Re: ECF No. 24

12 Now before the Court is Plaintiff Mikela Minacis’s “motion to reinstate,” ECF No. 24, which the Court construes as a motion to set aside the judgment of dismissal entered on May 15, 2024. The Court will grant the motion. I. BACKGROUND Minacis filed his complaint on January 3, 2024, bringing one claim for breach of contract. ECF No. 1. On January 5, 2024, Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim screened the complaint and concluded both that a federal court does not have the power to resolve the dispute raised by the complaint and that, even if it did, Minacis did not adequately allege the existence of a contract. ECF No. 4 at 2–3. On the first issue, also known as jurisdiction,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.