Usher

(PC) Bradford v. Usher

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20251:24-cv-00047California986 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, Case No. 1:24-cv-00047-KES-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. TO REQUIRE THAT PLAINTIFF PAY

FILING FEE IN ORDER TO PROCEED WITH

J. USHER, et al., THIS ACTION Defendants. Doc. 4 15 16 Plaintiff Raymond Bradford is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 17 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On January 10, 2024, plaintiff filed his initial complaint. Doc. 1. On January 11, 2024, 20 the assigned magistrate issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff be 21 required to pay the filing fee to proceed with this action. Doc. 4. Specifically, the findings and 22 recommendations find that plaintiff has at least three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that 23 the allegations in plaintiff’s complaint do not satisfy section 1915(g)’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.