Laurence J. Graham v. DuPont De Nemours, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20252:24-cv-09444California572 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAURENCE J. GRAHAM, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-09444-FLA (SKx)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. THE ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

TRANSFERRED TO THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF DUPONT DE NEMOURS, INC., et al., CALIFORNIA OR THE EASTERN 15 Defendants. DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 16

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER On January 30, 2024, Plaintiffs Laurence J. Graham and Betty Patrick Graham (“Plaintiffs”), acting in pro se, filed a complaint in the San Francisco County Superior Court, requesting rescission of contracts and damages related to real properties allegedly located in Sussex and Dinwiddie Counties, Virginia. Graham v. DuPont de Nemours, Inc., Case No. 3:24-cv-01551-RFL (N.D. Cal.), Dkt. 1 at 2. On February 8, 2024, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint naming additional entities as Defendants. Id. at 2, 12–46. On March 13, 2024, Defendant Iluka Resources, Inc. (“Ikura…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.