SVB Financial Group v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20255:23-cv-06543California777 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 SVB FINANCIAL GROUP, Case No. 23-cv-06543-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE

v. MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY'S MATERIAL FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE SHOULD BE SEALED

CORPORATION,

[Re: ECF No. 101] Defendant. 12 Before the Court is Plaintiff SVB Financial Group’s (“SVBFG”) Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should be Sealed. ECF 101. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES the motion. I. LEGAL STANDARD “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 (1978)). Consequently, access to motions and their attachments that are “more than …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.