SVB Financial Group v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20255:23-cv-06543California1,847 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 SVB FINANCIAL GROUP, Case No. 23-cv-06543-BLF

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF SVB

v. FINANCIAL GROUP’S

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER

CORPORATION, PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE

SEALED Defendant. [Re: ECF No. 93]

13 Before the Court is Plaintiff SVB Financial Group’s (“SVBFG”) Administrative Motion to 14 Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should be Sealed. ECF 93. For the reasons stated below, 15 the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion.

I. LEGAL STANDARD

17 “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and 18 documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 19 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.