Estate of Rocky Romer v. County of San Bernardino

Good Law

United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20255:24-cv-00777California6,335 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 || Eugene P. Ramirez (State Bar No. 134865) eugene, ramirez@manningkass.com 2 || Kayleigh Andersen (State Bar No. 306442) Rapicigh □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ 3 || MANNING & KAS

ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP

4||801 S. Figueroa St, 15'" Floor Los Angeles, California 90017-3012 5 || Telephone: Gb) 624-6900 Facsimile: (213) 624-6999 6 Attorneys for Defendant, COUNTY OF 7||SAN BERNARDINO, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

il ESTATE OF ROCKY ROMER, by. and Case No. 5:24-cv-00777-KK-DTB — throush successors in interest; ROGER ROMER, individually and as successor {onorable Kenly Kiya Kato, z 13 |] 1n interest, LOUETTA BRAGA, agistrate Judge, David T Bristow] > individually and as successor in interest, z STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.