Scott

(PC) Kendrid v. Scott

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20252:22-cv-02300California856 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FORREST KENDRID, No. 2:22-cv-02300-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND R. SCOTT, et al., FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding without counsel with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 11, 2024, defendants filed a motion to dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41 and 37 based on plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. On December 6, 2023, the court advised plaintiff that motions to dismiss shall be briefed pursuant to Local Rule 230(l). (ECF No. 37 at 6.) In addition, by order filed November 19, 2024, plaintiff was ordered to file an opposition to the pending motion to dismiss or a statement of voluntary dismissal of this action. (ECF No. 50.) Plaintiff was specifically cautioned that failure to comply with that order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.