Ahadzia

(PC) Foust v. Ahadzia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20252:24-cv-00950California2,168 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CARL FOUST, No. 2:24-cv-0950 SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

AHMAD AHADZIA, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). PROCEDURAL HISTORY On March 27, 2024, plaintiff initiated this civil rights action. In an order filed April 25, the previously assigned magistrate judge noted that plaintiff had not paid the filing fee or moved to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Plaintiff was ordered to pay the fee or file a motion to proceed IFP within thirty days. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff requested, and was granted, three extensions of time to file a motion to proceed IFP. (ECF Nos. 9, 32, 44.) In an order filed October 28, the court gave plaintiff one last opportunity…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.