Ramos Lopez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 16, 202523-1036California828 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 16 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IRENI RAMOS LOPEZ; BRYAN RAMOS No. 23-1036 CARRILLO, Agency Nos.

A215-688-907; A215-688-908

Petitioners,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 14, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, HURWITZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Ireni Ramos Lopez (“Ramos”) and his minor son Bryan Ramos Carrillo,

natives and citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of a decision of the Board of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Ramos’s son did not file his own application for relief, but he is listed as a derivative beneficiary of Ramos’s application. Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying Petitioners’ motion to remand…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.