Pedraza Madrigal v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 16, 202523-4312California1,167 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 16 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DONOVAN MANUEL PEDRAZA No. 23-4312 MADRIGAL, Agency No.

A208-083-243

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 14, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD and BENNETT, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, District Judge.***

Donovan Manuel Pedraza Madrigal, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order adopting and affirming the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable David A. Ezra, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation. Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.