Napa Industries v. A-Z Communications CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 2025B327760California3,703 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feuer, J.

Filed 1/16/25 Napa Industries v. A-Z Communications CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

NAPA INDUSTRIES, LLC, B327760

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 22CHCV00394)

A-Z COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Randy Rhodes, Judge. Reversed. Law Office of Daniel J. Bramzon & Associates and Kevin Hermansen for Defendant and Appellant. Darling & Wilson and Joshua G. Wilson for Plaintiff and Respondent.

_________________________ A-Z Communications, Inc. appeals from a judgment entered after a jury rendered a verdict in favor of its landlord, Napa…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.