Cody

Cody v. Ring LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20253:23-cv-00562California2,722 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANNETTE CODY, Case No. 23-cv-00562-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

RING LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 58 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Defendant Ring LLC’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff Annette Cody’s second amended complaint (“SAC”). The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss without leave to amend for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND In September 2022, Cody visited Ring’s website via a smart phone internet browser and used the website’s chat feature to have a brief conversation with a customer representative. SAC ¶ 4. Cody claims Ring enables a third party, Kustomer, Inc., to intercept chats between Ring and its customers by routing chat…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.