Dominguez

(PC) Wheatley v. Dominguez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20251:20-cv-00481California2,696 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICARDO WHEATLEY, Case No.: 1:20-cv-00481-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF’S

v. DISCOVERY RESPONSES AND DEEM

ADMISSIONS ADMITTED

D. DOMINGUEZ, et al., (Doc. 43) Defendants.

Plaintiff Ricardo Wheatley is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against Defendants Dominguez and Flores, Eighth Amendment failure to intervene claims against Dominguez, Denney, and Hernandez, and Eighth Amendment medical indifference claims against Dominguez, Denney, Flores, and Hernandez. I. INTRODUCTION1 The Court issued its Discovery and Scheduling Order on February 20, 2024. (Doc. 36.) The scheduling order included a discovery deadline of October 20, 2024, and a dispositive motion filing deadline of December 30, 2024. (Id.) 26 27 1 This action was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.