Zepp

(PC) Mosley v. Zepp

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20251:23-cv-00421California3,761 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 THETHESIUS HOSEA MOSLEY, No. 1:23-cv-00421-JLT-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT’S

v.

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE

ZEPP, GRANTED

Defendant. (ECF No. 41)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY (30) DAYS

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Thethesius Hosea Mosley is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 This case proceeds on Plaintiff’s deliberate indifference claim against Defendant Zepp, stemming from Plaintiff’s allegations in his complaint that Defendant failed to treat his knee injury. On June 20, 2024, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that Plaintiff does not have evidence to support his claim and the undisputed facts showed that Defendant extensively treated Plaintiff’s knee injury. (ECF No. 41). As discussed further below, despite multiple…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.