Tobias

Tobias v. NVIDIA Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20254:20-cv-06081California942 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CRISTINA TOBIAS, et al., Case No. 20-cv-06081-JST

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF

NVIDIA CORPORATION, et al., CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Defendants. Re: ECF No. 127

12 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement. ECF No. 127. The Court will deny the motion without prejudice for the reasons discussed below. First, it is not clear that the settlement is not reversionary. The Ninth Circuit has “not disallowed reversionary clauses outright,” but it “generally disfavor[s] them because they create perverse incentives.” Roes, 1–2 v. SFBSC Mgmt., LLC, 944 F.3d 1035, 1058 (9th Cir. 2019) (citing In re Volkswagen “Clean Diesel” Mktg., Sales Pracs., & Prods. Liab. Litig., 895 F.3d 597, 611–12 (9th Cir. 2018)). This Court “frequently rejects class settlements containing reversion clauses.” Alcazar v. Fashion Nova,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.