Harrison

Harrison v. Singh

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20254:21-cv-05431California1,494 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAMES RUHALLAH HARRISON, Case No. 21-cv-05431-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION

MANDEEP SINGH, Re: ECF No. 42 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate housed at Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”), filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”) doctor Singh failed to treat his shoulder pain, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. ECF Nos. 14, 17. On February 20, 2024, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant Singh. ECF No. 40. Plaintiff has filed a pleading titled “Requesting to Have And (sic) Hearing (OSC) Showing Cause in (unintelligible) of Merits and Objection to Judgement Rendered from this Court (Hardship) and Request to Summon’s Medical Doctor Duc Nguyen at Salinas Valley State Prison.” ECF No. 42. Because this pleading challenges the Court’s grant of summary judgment, the Court construes this pleading as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.