Jane Roe LM 89 v. Doe 1

I. BACKGROUND

A. Procedural Background On August 26, 2024, Plaintiff Jane Roe LM 89 filed her Complaint (Doc. No. 1-1) in state court alleging six causes of action: (1) negligence; (2) negligent supervision of a minor; (3) sexual abuse of a minor; (4) negligent hiring, supervision, and retention; (5) negligent failure to warn, train, or educate plaintiff; and (6) breach of mandatory duty against Defendants Doe 1, Doe 2, Doe 3, and Does 4-100 inclusive. On October 22, 2024, prior to being served with the Complaint, Defendants Doe 1 and Doe 2 filed an Answer in state court. On October 29, 2024, Defendant Doe 1, with Defendant Doe 2's consent, removed the case to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a). In her Motion to Remand, Plaintiff contends that the parties are not completely diverse, arguing in relevant part that Doe 3 is an unincorporated association with its principal place of business in Arcadia, California and that Doe 4 is a corporation with its principal place of business in Monterey Park, California. B. Factual Background Plaintiff is a California citizen. Complaint ¶ 3; Notice of Removal ¶¶ 5-6. Defendant Doe 1 is formally…