Meissner

Meissner v. Republic Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20251:24-cv-00086California1,557 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD L. MEISSNER, Case No. 1:24-cv-00086-KES-BAM

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO MODIFY

v. THE SCHEDULING ORDER

REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC., et al, ORDER VACATING JANUARY 31, 2025

MOTION HEARING

Defendants. (Doc. 28)

Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Richard L. Meissner’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to 18 Modify the Scheduling Order. (Doc. 28.) Defendants Republic Services, Inc. and Allied Waste Services of North America, LLC (“Defendants”) filed a notice of non-opposition, though requested modification of the Scheduling Order to extend the dispositive motion filing deadline 22 from June 30, 2025 to September 30, 2025. (Docs. 30, 31.) The Court finds the motion 23 suitable for decision without the need for oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing on the 24 motion currently set for January 31, 2025, is HEREBY VACATED, and the matter is submitted 25 on the record. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). 26 Having…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.