Quicklogic Corporation v. Konda Technologies, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 QUICKLOGIC CORPORATION, Case No. 21-cv-04657-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT

v. 10 Re: ECF No. 155 KONDA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

13 Before the Court is pro se Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff Venkat Konda’s (“Dr. Konda”) motion for relief from judgment entered on August 11, 20231 (ECF No. 83 “Judgment”) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60. ECF No. 155 (“Mot.” or “Motion”). Dr. Konda argues relief from Judgment under Rule 60 is appropriate because Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, QuickLogic Corporation, and QuickLogic’s counsel “obtained the Court’s judgment based on misrepresentations to the Court.” Mot. 4. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES the Motion. 21

23 1 Dr. Konda’s Motion states that he seeks relief from the August 11, 2023 Judgment. See Mot. 28 (requesting that the Court “grant Dr. Konda’s Motion for relief from the August 11, 2023 Judgment”). But on…