Trate

(HC) Winston v. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20251:24-cv-00837California392 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEANTHONY WINSTON, ) Case No.: 1: 24-cv-0837 JLT HBK ) Petitioner, ) ORDER DISREGARDING PETITIONER’S ) UNTIMELY OBJECTIONS AND MOTION TO v. ) AMEND THE PETITION ) B.M. TRATE, ) ) Respondent. ) ) )

On August 27, 2024, the magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations, recommending the Court dismiss the petition and deny Petitioner’s requests for injunctive relief. (Doc. 9.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Petitioner and notified him that any objections were due within 14 days. (Id. at 6.) The Court also advised Petitioner the failure to file timely objections may result in the wavier of rights. (Id. citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014).) On September 20, 2024, the Court performed a de novo review of the matter, dismissed the petition, and entered judgment. (Docs. 10, 11.) After the Court entered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.