Raymond Kang v. Emerald X, LLC
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20258:23-cv-01473California576 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL
Case No. 8:23-cv-01473-FWS-KES Date: January 16, 2025 Title: Raymond Kang v. Emerald X, LLC, et al.
HONORABLE FRED W. SLAUGHTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Rolls Royce Paschal N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Not Present Not Present
CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF’S
REMAINING CLAIMS SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER
[46] In this case, Plaintiff Raymond Kang (‘Plaintiff’) asserts eight claims against Defendants X, LLC and Emerald Expositions, LLC (together, “Defendants”): (1) retaliation in of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), (2) failure to prevent discrimination and harassment in violation of FEHA, (3) wrongful termination in violation of policy, (4) intentional infliction of emotional distress, (5) age discrimination in violation of FEHA, (6) racial discrimination in violation of…