Raymond Kang v. Emerald X, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20258:23-cv-01473California576 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL

Case No. 8:23-cv-01473-FWS-KES Date: January 16, 2025 Title: Raymond Kang v. Emerald X, LLC, et al.

HONORABLE FRED W. SLAUGHTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Rolls Royce Paschal N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present Not Present

CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF’S

REMAINING CLAIMS SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER

[46] In this case, Plaintiff Raymond Kang (‘Plaintiff’) asserts eight claims against Defendants X, LLC and Emerald Expositions, LLC (together, “Defendants”): (1) retaliation in of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), (2) failure to prevent discrimination and harassment in violation of FEHA, (3) wrongful termination in violation of policy, (4) intentional infliction of emotional distress, (5) age discrimination in violation of FEHA, (6) racial discrimination in violation of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.