Kieu

(PC) Ardds v. Kieu

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20252:20-cv-00133California13,914 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTOINE L. ARDDS, No. 2:20-cv-0133 TLN CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

V. KIEU, C. LUNDGREN AND J.

LEVIN,

15 Defendants.1

17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to the second amended complaint (ECF No. 77), plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 79) and defendants’ motion to strike plaintiff’s sur-reply. (ECF No. 87.) This action proceeds on plaintiff’s second amended complaint for Eighth Amendment claims against defendants Staff Psychologist and plaintiff’s Mental Health Primary Clinician (“MHPC”) Kieu, California Health Care Facility (“CHCF”) Rehabilitation Therapist Lundgren and Social Worker Levin, all members of the Interdisciplinary Treatment Team (“IDTT”), for their conduct between 27 The Clerk of the Court is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.