1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 2:23-cv-02261-DJC-JDP 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER

14 GENESIS SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL Inc., et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 The Court previously denied Counsel for Defendant Genesis System 19 International Inc.’s Motion to Withdraw. (ECF No. 18.) Counsel for Defendant now 20 seeks reconsideration of the Court’s prior order denying that motion on the grounds 21 that there were facts and circumstances not shown in the previous motion. (See ECF 22 No. 20.) 23 Having considered counsel’s arguments and the relevant law as well as 24 Plaintiff’s non-opposition to granting reconsideration, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 25 Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 20) is GRANTED. See 389 Orange St. Partners v. 26 Arnold, 179 F.3d 656, 665 (9th Cir. 1999). Further, Defense Counsel’s Motion to 27 Withdraw from Representation of Defendant Genesis Systems (ECF No. 14) is 28 //// 1 | GRANTED. The hearing on this motion, presently set for January 23, 2024, at 2 | 1:00 P.M. in Courtroom 10, is VACATED. 3 Within 14 days of this order, Defendant Genesis Systems International, Inc. is 4 | ordered to appear with new counsel. Should Defendant fail to appear with counsel, 5 | Plaintiff may seek the entry of default against Defendant Genesis Systems International 6 | Inc.! 7 8 IT 1S SO ORDERED. 9 | Dated: _January 15, 2025 “Dane A CoD tto— Hon. Daniel alabretta 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ||§$ ———- ‘ Under the Local Rules of this District, a corporation or other entity may appear only by an attorney. 28 | Local Rule 183(a).