Prime Ins. Co. v. Tourismo Express, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRIME INSURANCE COMPANY, No. 2:24-cv-02492-DAD-CSK Plaintiff, v. SCHEDULING ORDER TOURISMO EXPRESS, INC., et al., Defendants. 16 Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court has reviewed the parties’ joint status report (Doc. No. 18) and has determined that the court need not “consult[] with the parties’ attorneys and any unrepresented parties at a scheduling conference,” before issuing a scheduling order in this case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(1)(B). Accordingly, the court vacates the initial scheduling conference set for January 28, 2025 and hereby issues this scheduling order. I. SERVICE OF PROCESS Named defendants Tourismo Express, Inc., Maria Guadalupe Rodrigues Calvillo, Andres Mendez Rodriguez, Santiago Mendez Rodriguez, Diego Mendez Rodriguez, Jose Omar Molina Amavizca, Pascual Ventura Flores, Mauro Diaz Santillan, Jose Luis Navarro Ayala, Miguel A. Mendez Navarro, Roberto Felipe…