(PS) Bevan v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20252:24-cv-02641California1,251 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RUSSELL BEVAN and HEIDI LEE, No. 2:24-cv-2641-DAD-SCR Plaintiffs, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiffs Russell Bevan and Heidi Lee are proceeding pro se in this action, which was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On September 30, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a complaint and paid the filing fee. ECF No. 3. On October 28, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a “Proof of Service,” but Defendants have not appeared in the action. The Court has reviewed the Complaint and hereby sua sponte directs the Plaintiffs to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim and/or lack of subject matter jurisdiction. I. The Complaint The Complaint is styled as a “Cause of Action of Accounting.” ECF No. 3 at 1. It names as Defendants: 1) the United States of America; 2) Department of Treasury; 3) Internal Revenue 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.