(HC) Khademi v. Roseville Police Dept.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVOOD KHADEMI, No. 2:24-cv-2797 CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND ROSEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Respondent.

17 Petitioner, a county inmate, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). However, for the reasons set forth below, the petition should be summarily dismissed because the court lacks jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claims. I. Screening Standard In screening the habeas petition, the court applies the Rule 4 framework of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Under Rule 4’s standard, if it plainly appears from the petition, any attached…