(PS) Mallory v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20252:24-cv-03663California867 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON MALLORY, No. 2:24-cv-3663 DJC AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding without a lawyer, has filed a motion for a temporary restraining order. ECF No. 4. Based on the analysis below, the undersigned recommends that the motion be DENIED. I. RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), filed this case on December 20, 2024, indicating that an amended complaint would be forthcoming. ECF No. 1 at 2. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on January 8, 2025. ECF No. 3. Pursuant to the screening process associated with IFP status, the initial complaint was rejected with leave to amend. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff also filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and injunctive relief on January 8, 2025. ECF No. 4. That motion is now…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.