Kumar
Kumar v. Garland
Opinion
Opinion
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1
Kumar practices the Sikh religion. Prior to his arrival in the United States,
he resided in Punjab, India. On January 4, 2017, Kumar joined the Shiromani
Akali Dal Mann Party (“Mann Party”), which, as we have previously recognized,
“advocates for the creation of Khalistan, a sovereign state for the Sikh people.”
Kaur v. Wilkinson, 986 F.3d 1216, 1219 (9th Cir. 2021). We have also previously
recognized that “Mann Party members have faced persistent harassment,
intimidation, threats, and violence in Punjab,” the region where Kumar resided. Id.
The Bharatiya Janata Party (“BJP”) is a major Indian political party that opposes
1 The factual assertions here primarily stem from the BIA’s final order and Kumar’s credible testimony given during his removal hearing on January 10, 2020.
23-308 the Mann Party. Singh v. Garland, 97 F.4th 597, 600 (9th Cir. 2024) [hereinafter
Singh]. According to Kumar, the BJP is the “central government” that suppresses
the Mann Party in Punjab and seeks to convert everyone to Hinduism. Notably,