Sunrise Financial v. Sarbaz CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 2025B324659California3,471 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/17/25 Sunrise Financial v. Sarbaz CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

SUNRISE FINANCIAL, LLC, B324659

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC667451) v.

MANOUCHER SARBAZ et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Lia Martin, Judge. Affirmed in part and reversed in part and remanded with instructions. Law Offices of Steven L. Sugars and Steven L. Sugars for Plaintiff and Appellant. Gilchrest Law Group and Robert M. Gilchrest for Defendants and Respondents. Sunrise Financial, LLC (Sunrise) sued to recover the unpaid balance on two promissory notes signed by defendant Manoucher Sarbaz, who invested the loan…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.