Davarpanah

Davarpanah v. Miso Robotics CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 2025B334399California3,421 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/17/25 Davarpanah v. Miso Robotics CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

NIMA DAVARPANAH, B334399

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 23STCV02057) v.

MISO ROBOTICS, INC.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael L. Stern, Judge. Affirmed. Jackson Lewis, Frank C. Olah, Nareg A. Kourouyan, and Dylan B. Carp for Defendant and Appellant. Law Offices of Stephen M. Harris and Stephen M. Harris for Plaintiff and Respondent.

_________________________ Defendant Miso Robotics, Inc. (Miso) appeals from the denial of its motion to compel arbitration of plaintiff Nima Davarpanah’s wrongful termination lawsuit. Miso argues that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.