Arevalos

(PC) Hackworth v. Arevalos

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20251:19-cv-01362California2,724 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT HACKWORTH, No. 1:19-cv-01362-KES-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY

EXECUTION OF JUDGMENT WITHOUT A

v. BOND, SETTING SUPERSEDEAS BOND

AMOUNT AT $15,000 TO STAY

E. AREVALOS, JUDGMENT, AND GRANTING

TEMPORARY STAY TO ALLOW FOR

Defendant. POSTING OF BOND ORDER DENYING HACKWORTH’S

MOTION FOR COURT ORDER

17 Docs. 161, 167

19 Plaintiff Robert Hackworth (“Hackworth”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, in which he asserted First and Eighth Amendment claims against Defendant E. Arevalos (“Arevalos”), a correctional officer employed by California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). The case proceeded to a jury trial, and the jury returned a verdict for Hackworth on both claims, awarding both compensatory and punitive damages. Docs. 157, 158. Hackworth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.