Daniel Saavedra v. Ron Godwin

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20252:22-cv-06685California1,282 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL SAAVEDRA, Case No. 2:22-cv-06685-MEMF (GJS) Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

RON GODWIN, Warden, Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Report recommends the denial of habeas relief for Petitioner’s claims challenging his convictions for sexual abuse of his daughters. (Dkt. No. 17.) For the following reasons, Petitioner’s Objections to the Report (Dkt. No. 21) do not warrant a change to the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendation. Petitioner objects that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions. (Dkt. No. 21 at 2-4.) He argues that the victims’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.