Donohue III v. Antioch Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20253:23-cv-05564California1,242 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KING DAVID LEVON DONAHUE

III, No. C 23-05564 WHA Plaintiff,

v.

ANTIOCH POLICE DEPARTMENT;

COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA;

CITY OF ANTIOCH; OFFICERS

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

JOSHUA RIOSBAAS, KYLE SMITH,

SHAWN MARQUES, JACOB KING, RECONSIDER

RYAN GEIS, RUDOLPH NIEVES,

ARTURO BECERRA, MATTHEW KOCH, BRANDON BUSBY, and JOSHUA EVANS; and PROSECUTOR

HEATHER P. TURNER,

Defendants.

INTRODUCTION In this pro se Section 1983 action, two defendants move to reconsider the Court’s order foreclosing further motions to dismiss. For reasons below, the motion to reconsider is denied. STATEMENT The parties know the history here (Dkt. No. 104). Its essentials are that in November 2024 the Court granted in part and denied in part multiple motions to dismiss, that in November, December, and January defendants did not provide basic information to permit plaintiff to amend,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.