Jordan Eisman v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
2 3 4 5 6
United States District Court Central District of California
11 JORDAN EISMAN, Case № 2:24-cv-01982-ODW (AJRx)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING
v. 14 JO HNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, MOTION TO DISMISS [18] INC. et al.,
Defendants.
17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Jordan Eisman brings this putative class action against Defendants 20 Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. and Kenvue, Inc., asserting causes of action for 21 fraud, breach of warranties, and violation of consumer protection laws, based on the 22 undisclosed presence of benzene in two of Defendants’ Neutrogena T/Gel Therapeutic 23 Shampoos (the “Products”). (Compl. ¶¶ 1, 43–133, ECF No. 1.) Defendants move to 24 dismiss Eisman’s claims pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule” or 25 “Rules”) 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). (Mot. Dismiss (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 18.) 26 For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS the Motion.1
28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without…