Ndizeye

Ndizeye v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20253:24-cv-01768California1,788 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL NDIZEYE, Case No.: 3:24-cv-01768-JES-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO CITY OF SAN DIEGO,

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

Defendant. 2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT

PURSUANT TO SCREENING UNDER

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)

18 3) DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ELECTRONICALLY

FILE DOCUMENTS AS PRO SE

LITIGANT

21 4) DENYING AS MOOT REQUEST

FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

23 [ECF Nos. 6, 8, 9] 25 // // // Plaintiff Daniel Ndizeye (“Ndizeye” or “Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint alleging violations of various civil rights arising from the alleged failure of Defendant City of San Diego (“City”) to adequately maintain safe, accessible, and non- discriminatory public infrastructure. ECF No. 1. Ndizeye also filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”), (ECF No. 2), which this Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.