Ortiz

(PC) Rios v. Ortiz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20251:23-cv-01595California516 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE MIGUEL RIOS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01595-HBK (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

RENEWED MOTION TO PROCEED IN

v. FORMA PAUPERIS AND REASSESSING

FULL FILING FEE

ORTIZ, (Doc. No. 29) Defendant. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) filed on December 19, 2024. (Doc. No. 29). Plaintiff, a former state prisoner, initiated this action while he was incarcerated. (Doc. No. 1). Although currently released, Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the full amount of the statutory filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). As set forth in the Court’s December 9, 2024 Order, the total amount that remains due towards the $350.00 filing fee is $350.00. (Doc. No. 27 at 3). Due to Plaintiff’s release from custody, there is no inmate trust account from which periodic filing fees may be garnished and forwarded to the Court. Although the Ninth Circuit has yet to decide how a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.