Dayal

Dayal v. County of Kern

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20251:24-cv-00039California1,408 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NISHI DAYAL, Case No. 1:24-cv-00039-JLT-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ v. STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND

DEADLINES AS MODIFIED

COUNTY OF KERN, et al., (Doc. 37) Defendants.

17 On January 10, 2025, the parties filed a jointly executed stipulated request (Doc. 35) to extend discovery deadlines. The parties’ request was unaccompanied by attorney declarations and, thus, violated both the scheduling order (Doc. 24 at 9) and the Court’s earlier order granting the parties’ earlier stipulated request to extend deadlines (Doc. 29 at 2). The Court, therefore, denied the parties’ request. (Doc. 36). Pending before the Court is the parties’ renewed jointly executed stipulated request (Doc. 37) to extend the discovery deadlines provided for in the scheduling order (Doc. 24). Background On June 5, 2024, the Court adopted the case management dates proposed by the parties, including a …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.