Sutton
Sutton v. California Department of Parks and Recreation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 IMANI BEY SUTTON, et al., Case No. 5:23-cv-02057-BLF
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART PARKS’ MOTION
TO DISMISS, AND DENYING
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND FRIENDS’ MOTION TO DISMISS RECREATION, et al., [Re: ECF Nos. 46, 47] Defendants.
13 Before the Court are two motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). Defendants California Department of Parks and Recreation, Andrew Dobbs, Peter Estes, Trevor Morgan, Scott Sipes, Phil Bergman, and David Williams (collectively, “Parks”) move to dismiss all claims against them. ECF No. 46 (“Parks Mot.”). Defendants Friends of Santa Cruz State Parks and Donna Walizer (collectively, “Friends”) move to dismiss the Sixth Cause of Action in Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. ECF No. 47 (“Friends Mot.”). Plaintiffs oppose both motions. ECF Nos. 48 (“Parks Opp.”), 49 (“Friends Opp.”). …