Moore

Moore v. Flores

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20255:23-cv-02065California2,252 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RYAN T. MOORE, Case No. 23-cv-02065-EKL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

FLORES, Re: Dkt. No. 28 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The sole claim in this case alleges that the defendant violated plaintiff’s right to access the courts by eavesdropping on a video call between plaintiff and his appellate attorney. ECF No. 8 at 3-5. Defendant filed a motion for summary judgement (ECF No. 28) arguing that plaintiff’s claim fails on the merits. Plaintiff filed an opposition (ECF No. 39) and defendant filed a reply (ECF No. 40). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND The facts are undisputed unless otherwise noted. At the relevant time, plaintiff was housed at San Quentin Rehabilitation Center. ECF No. 8 at 2. Defendant Flores is a correctional officer who was employed at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.