Khan
Khan v. Perez Pantoja
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20255:24-cv-03904California609 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MUHAMMAD KHAN, Case No. 24-cv-03904 BLF (PR)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR Plaintiff,
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND v. NON-PRISONER IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION;
DIRECTING CLERK TO FILE
PANTOJA, et al., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION UNDER
SEAL
Defendants. (Docket No. 7)
Plaintiff, a state parolee, filed the instant civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for unconstitutional acts that took place at the Correctional Training Facility, where he was formerly housed. Dkt. No. 1. On December 2, 2024, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. Dkt. No. 6. Plaintiff was directed to file a response within twenty-eight days from the date the order was filed. Id. at 6. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis was also on the wrong form since he is no longer …