Khan

Khan v. Perez Pantoja

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20255:24-cv-03904California609 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MUHAMMAD KHAN, Case No. 24-cv-03904 BLF (PR)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR Plaintiff,

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND v. NON-PRISONER IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION;

DIRECTING CLERK TO FILE

PANTOJA, et al., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION UNDER

SEAL

Defendants. (Docket No. 7)

Plaintiff, a state parolee, filed the instant civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for unconstitutional acts that took place at the Correctional Training Facility, where he was formerly housed. Dkt. No. 1. On December 2, 2024, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. Dkt. No. 6. Plaintiff was directed to file a response within twenty-eight days from the date the order was filed. Id. at 6. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis was also on the wrong form since he is no longer …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.