Robert Trionfi v. County of San Bernardino

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20255:24-cv-01882California579 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. EDCV 24-1882-KK-DTBx Date: January 17, 2025 Title:

Present: The Honorable KENLY KIYA KATO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Noe Ponce Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction

On December 3, 2024, plaintiff Robert Trionfi (“Plaintiff”) filed the operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) against defendants San Bernardino County, San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department, Alec Ramirez, Cody Blackwell, Nicholas Baca, Scott Abernathy, Big Bear City, and Does 1 through 100 (“Defendants”) asserting state law claims arising out of Defendants’ search of Plaintiff’s residence. ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 18, FAC.

Federal courts are courts of “limited jurisdiction” which “possess only that power authorized by Constitution and statute[.]” Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.