Daisy Merchant v. OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20255:24-cv-02669California1,640 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 || DAISY MERCHANT, ) Case No. CV 24-2669 FMO (SHKx) Plaintiff, V. ORDER REMANDING ACTION

O’REILLY AUTO ENTERPRISES, LLC,

Defendant.

On November 8, 2024, Daisy Merchant (“plaintiff”) filed a Complaint in the Riverside County Superior Court against O’Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC (“defendant”) asserting state law claims relating to her employment. (See Dkt. 1, Notice of Removal (“NOR”) at J] & 3); (Dkt. 1-3, Complaint at Jf] 31-79). On December 19, 2024, defendant removed that action on diversity jurisdiction grounds pursuant to U.S.C. §§ 1332(a) and 1441. (See Dkt. 1, NOR at { 8). 22 || Having reviewed the pleadings, the court hereby remands this action to state court for lack of 23 subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). LEGAL STANDARD “Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. They possess only that power…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.