Bailey
(PC) Howard v. Bailey
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KARLIS RUBENS HOWARD, Case No. 1:24-cv-00897-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY
BALANCE OF FILING FEE OR FILE
v. UPDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PENNER, et al.,
FEBRUARY 21, 2025 DEADLINE
Defendants.
16 17 On January 13, 2025, Plaintiff Karlis Rubens Howard, who is proceeding pro se, filed a Notice of Change of Address indicating he was recently released from CDCR custody. (See Doc. No. 14). Because Plaintiff initiated this action while a prisoner and was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (Doc. No. 4), he is “required to pay the full amount of a filing fee” under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Based on Plaintiff’s “certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for . . . the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint,” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2), the Court granted Plaintiff IFP,…