Kassam

Kassam v. Flux Power Holdings, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20253:25-cv-00113California844 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 Asfa Kassam, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-02051-CDS-BNW

Plaintiffs Order Granting Unopposed Motion to Transfer or Change Venue v.

Flux Power Holdings, Inc., et al., [ECF No. 11] Defendants

9 On December 23, 2024, defendants Flux Power Holdings, Inc. and Ronald F. Dutt filed an unopposed1 motion to transfer this action to the Southern District of California. Mot., ECF No. 11. Because the motion is unopposed, and a review of the motion on its merits reveals that transfer to the Southern District of California appropriate, the court grants the motion.2 I. Discussion Under 28 U.S.C. § 1391, a civil action may be brought in (1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located; (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated; or 19 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.