Camenisch
Camenisch v. Umpqua Bank
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SHELA CAMENISCH, et al., Case No. 20-cv-05905-PCP
Plaintiffs,
OMNIBUS ORDER ON MOTIONS TO
v. EXCLUDE EXPERTS’ OPINIONS AND
TESTIMONY AND MOTIONS IN
UMPQUA BANK, LIMINE Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 242, 243, 244, 245, 247
Before the Court are defendant Umpqua Bank’s motions to exclude the opinions and testimony of plaintiffs’ experts Catherine Ghiglieri, Dan Salah, and Micheal Goldberg and both parties’ motions in limine.1 For the reasons set forth herein, the parties’ motions in limine and Umqpua’s motion to exclude Ghiglieri’s opinions and testimony are granted in part. Umpqua’s motions to exclude the opinions and testimony of Salah and Goldberg are denied. The parties are further ordered to file a joint sealing motion that consolidates all pending sealing motions regarding material filed in connection with the motions resolved by this order. I. Umpqua’s Motions to Exclude Plaintiffs’ Experts’ Opinions…