Allied Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20258:24-cv-02437California955 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALLIED PROPERTY AND Case No. 8:24-cv-02437-SB-JDE

CASUALTY INSURANCE

COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

REMAND [DKT. NO. 19]

v. HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA et al., Defendants. Defendants Hyundai Motor America (HMA) and Kia America, Inc. (KA), both California citizens, removed this case solely based on diversity jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 1. However, the forum-defendant rule provides that “[a] civil action otherwise removable solely on . . . [diversity jurisdiction] may not be removed if any of the parties in interest properly joined and served as defendants is a citizen of the State in which such action is brought.” 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b)(2). In their removal notice, Defendants argued that the rule does not bar removal here because they “ha[d] not been served with the complaint.” Dkt. No. 1 at 4–5. However, Plaintiffs have presented evidence showing that they served HMA and KA the day before removal and now move to remand the case to state court. Dkt. Nos. 19-3, 19-4. The Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument and vacates the January 24, 2025…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.