Macomber

(PC) Travers v. Macomber

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20251:25-cv-00033California2,736 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID M. TRAVERS, No. 1:25-cv-00033-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v. TO THIS ACTION J. MACOMBER, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF THE

Defendants. ACTION (ECF No. 1) 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983.

19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s complaint, filed January 10, 2025. 20 I.

SCREENING REQUIREMENT

22 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 23 governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The 24 Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally 25 “frivolous or malicious,” that “fail[] to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or that “seek[] 26 monetary relief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.