Morales

(HC) Leyva v. Morales

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20251:25-cv-00072California885 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL ANTHONY LEYVA, Case No. 1:25-cv-00072-EPG-HC

Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

v. FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST STATE

JUDICIAL REMEDIES

RAUL MORALES,

Respondent. ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL

16 Petitioner Michael Anthony Leyva is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. I. DISCUSSION A. Exhaustion Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases requires preliminary review of a habeas petition and allows a district court to dismiss a petition before the respondent is ordered to file a response, if it “plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.