Morales
(HC) Leyva v. Morales
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20251:25-cv-00072California885 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL ANTHONY LEYVA, Case No. 1:25-cv-00072-EPG-HC
Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
v. FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST STATE
JUDICIAL REMEDIES
RAUL MORALES,
Respondent. ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S
REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF
COUNSEL
16 Petitioner Michael Anthony Leyva is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. I. DISCUSSION A. Exhaustion Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases requires preliminary review of a habeas petition and allows a district court to dismiss a petition before the respondent is ordered to file a response, if it “plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, 28…